Showing posts with label Houston Rockets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Houston Rockets. Show all posts

Friday, January 9, 2009

Rockets vs. Thunder: Pre-game primer

vs.

Houston Rockets (22-15) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder (5-31)
Friday, Jan. 9
Ford Center
Oklahoma City, OK
7:00 CST

TV: FS Oklahoma
Radio: WWLS The Sports Animal

It should be a somber crowd tonight at the Ford. Maybe we should all wear black as we mourn the loss of the Sooners. Twas a wonderful season, but nothing hurts more than coming up empty-handed on the biggest stage in your sport.

Maybe the Thunder can give us some solace! Yeah.

I'm in the process of setting up the new website, so I'm a little swamped. But here's a quick breakdown:

Rockets good.
Thunder not so much.

But I actually sort of like OKC to play well tonight despite that 42-point whooping the other night. Under Scott Brooks, that doesn't happen much and typically the team comes back competitive. Hopefully, Nenad Krstic gets more settled in tonight and unlike the Wolves, the Rockets don't hit EVERYTHING. The Rockets are just .500 on the road and the Thunder have played them relatively well. And I'm kind of excited to have a real 7-footer to match up on Yao. I'm going to go on record and make a prediction for tonight: Oklahoma City 101, Houston 97. Yep. Maybe I'm reaching because I need something to help me get over last night. As you can see, I took it pretty hard.

Monday, November 17, 2008

Rockets surge past Thunder, 100-89

BOX SCORE

If you told me before tip that Oklahoma City would lose by 11 to the Houston Rockets (7-4) I would have said, "Hey that means we probably played pretty good!"

And they did. For one half again. The score was 56-50 at the break. Five minutes into the third, OKC (1-10) was down double-digits.

So what went wrong? Why couldn't OKC keep pace again? Well, for one the Thunder could not hit shots in the third and fourth quarters. They went from shooting over 50 percent to shooting right at their average of 40 percent. Every open look hit everything but the bottom of the net. It's clear: This team just does not have the talent to compete with an average or above average team for 48 minutes. It's that simple. Over the course of a game, Oklahoma City just can not keep pace with probably 90 percent of the league. Obviously, we can hope for improvement and we can hope for something to miraculously change, but at this point, that's all we can do. Hope.

Second, Jeff Green went stale. He had 13 at the half and only three in the second. And not only were the Thunder missing open jumpers from 20, they were missing the most open shot of all - free throws. OKC went 18-27 from the line (67 percent).

Two of the biggest misses were Johan Petro about midway through the fourth. OKC had the Rockets lead to eight and Petro came up with a big board after a Joe Smith miss.

As Petro walked to the line, I knew he'd miss both. It was just obvious. Because that's why these guys are 1-10. They don't do any of these little things right to win. They don't knock down the two free throws to cut it to a two possession game. They don't complete the three on one fast break. They don't secure a loose rebound even though three Thunder players are around the ball. Just the type of things that make you scream at the TV and then dig around the couch so you can throw the remote at it.

Kevin Durant was his usual self, scoring 29 and grabbing seven rebounds. And hey, Russell Westbrook actually played three more minutes than Earl Watson! How exciting. He was decent scoring 14 on 5-14, but he also picked up five steals. To which at one point Grant Long said, "Westbrook is known for his offensive prowess, but this defense of his is a real nice surprise." I'll let you off the hook there Grant. You're new. You probably didn't know that pretty much the reasoning behind drafting Westbrook was his defensive skills. That's ok.

And with how unproductive Nick Collison is right now, I start Joe Smith over him. Collison's stat lines make me wonder right now. Four points, three rebounds. What's the deal there? Where's under-the-radar guy that puts up 10 and nine every night?

It's tough to win when you're only productive on a night-in, night-out basis from two or three positions. This team is no where near complete. It needs another scorer (or two). It needs a reliable three point shooter. It needs a post player that can score AND defend. It needs a point guard that isn't one dimensional and can drive, dish and shoot (Westbrook will be that man, but he's not there yet). I believed before the season Oklahoma City would give this squad a bump and that they'd win these type of home games just like the Hornets did (that team was 4-6 after 10). But there's a difference between the two teams: Chris Paul. One team has him, the other team doesn't.

Oklahoma City has tomorrow off and then another home game against the 1-8 Clippers. There's a winnable game. Maybe.

Rockets vs. Thunder: Pre-game primer

vs.
Houston Rockets (6-4) vs. Oklahoma City Thunder
Monday, November 17
Ford Center
Oklahoma City, OK
7:00 PM CST

TV: Fox Sports Oklahoma (Cox 37, HD 722)
Radio: WWLS The Sports Animal (98.1 FM, 640 AM)
Is there any hope for tonight? Any reason at all to turn off College Football Live's endless coverage of OU/Tech and tune in to watch Oklahoma City play the Rockets tonight?
(Thinking...)
(Still thinking...)
Ok, so I don't really have a reason per say, but I can tell you this: Yao Ming is really tall, Tracy McGrady is really good and Ron Artest is a little unbalanced so who knows what we might see? Just like the thousands of you Oklahomans that chug to the Myriad to watch Doug Sauter's Blazers play, go watch the Thunder for the outside chance of a cool fist fight tonight. The Rockets rumbled with the Suns last week - even though goonie Matt Barnes started it - so I guess there's a chance.
Because other than that, I can't really think of much of a reason to watch this team at this point. One night, OKC gets down by 30 and then the other team falls asleep and the Thunder try to make a game out of it. The next night, they do the same thing again. Then again. And then they play hard and consistent for two quarters and just the opposite of the previous nights, they tumble in the second half. As frustrating as it is to watch, I bet it's even more so for the dudes on the floor. We can tell ourselves it will get better and we can keep chalking it up to inexperience, but as long as it keeps happening, we will keep getting sadder. But one thing - the Rockets haven't blown anyone out yet in their six wins. Every game has been close, including an 89-77 win over the Thunder at the beginning of the month.

But these were the type of games we lived for (warning: Hornets comparison) in 2005. These were the type of out-of-nowhere wins that made us fall in love with that transplanted group. Of course they had Chris Paul and we have Earl Watson, but still, I guess it's possible.
What is encouraging for OKC though is Jeff Green. He's averaging 15. 2 points and 6.3 rebounds per game. He's becoming the player Sam Presti has dreamed about. Kevin Durant has been solid, a little inconsistent himself, but solid. Russell Westbrook sure has flashes of awesomeness, but then there's the bad charge, the bad turnover or the bad shot. So what will it take to be competitive tonight? For once, all three of those guys have a good game together. Forget Earl Watson, Desmond Mason or Nick Collison. Wins are going to come through these three guys. Collison and company are absolutely vital to give support, but those three guys will have to be the guys to carry OKC to wins. Especially if it wants to win games like tonight, where it realistically isn't supposed to have any shot.

This will be the first time the Thunder has to go head-to-head with the Oklahoma Sooners men's basketball team. Lucky for Kevin Durant and company, OU is playing Mississippi Valley State, so maybe not that many will choose Lloyd Noble over the Ford Center tonight. But maybe unlucky for the Thunder: What would you rather see - 20 incredible dunks by Blake Griffin or 20 Earl Watson jumpers clank off back-iron. A tougher choice than I thought.